John Swales (1938-2025)

I recently heard the sad news that John Swales had died.

University of Michigan Obituary

He was an important person for EAP and I am glad to have been doing EAP when his influence was at its height.

When I first started teaching EAP writing, the popular books were Janelle Cooper’s  Think and Link (1979) and Bob Jordan’s Academic Writing (1996, 1st edition 1980). Both were very useful to a new EAP teacher.

However, they concentrated on teaching short academic text types and academic functions and notions, such as (Cooper, 1979):

  1. Sequencing
    • –Instructions, Processes, Past Events
  2. Classification
    • –Lists, Diagrams, Texts, Definitions
  3. Comparison & Contrast
    1. –Similarities, Differences, Concession, Analogies
  4. Cause & Effect
    1. –Consequences, Explanations, References, Elaboration

Although this was a great development in the way we see and teach language, it seems to me, though, that this was still a synthetic approach (Wilkins, 1976). This approach is still dividing the language into parts – albeit larger parts, called cognitive genres by Bruce (2008) – which the learner has to put back together again.

But most student assignments are NOT definitions, comparisons or classifications by themselves. The assignments may require the students to make use of these cognitive genres as they combine these texts into larger complete texts with a clear purpose and audience, called social genres by Bruce (2008). However, the early textbooks did not provide any help for the students on how to do this. What was needed was the concept of genre, brought to a wider audience by, e.g., Swales (1990).

As EAP teachers we need to concentrate on our students’ purposes in writing, the genres that they need to produce and how these genres are realised. In order to do that, we need to investigate exactly which genres our students need and then do the genre analysis to work out the linguistic realisations of these genres.

We tried to do that in our Successful Academic Writing book (Gillett, Hammond  & Martala, 2009).

Swales’s Genre Analysis(1990) was very important in helping to answer my problem and write the book

BALEAP Conference, Reading, 2015:
Richard Smith, John Swales, Meriel Bloor, Andy Gillett

References

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic approach. London: Continuum.

Cooper, J. (1979). Think and link. London: Arnold.

Gillett, A. J., Hammond, A. C. & Martala, M. (2009). Successful academic writing. London: Pearson Longman.

Jordan, R. R. (1999). Academic writing course (3rd ed.). London: Longman..

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

.Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

EMI – English Medium Instruction

Is EMI ESP? Does EMI belong to ESP? No, but some people think it should do and that does not make sense to me.

ESP is about teaching English. EMI is about teaching other non-language subjects.

As Macaro (2018) defines it, EMI is

The use of English language to teach academic subjects (other than English itself) in countries or jurisdictions: where the first language of the majority of the population is not English.

Continue reading

ESP/EGP Distinction: Is it Real?

I have been supervising MA TESOL and Applied Linguistics students this summer as they write their dissertations and I have most recently been marking them. May of the students have focussed on ESP (both EAP and EOP) for their research, but most of them have concentrated on general English (EGP).  I also attended a Business English conference in the summer. I saw some interesting presentations at the conference  and have have seen some interesting MA studies and it has made me realise that the distinction between EGP and ESP may not be so clear.

Continue reading

ESP and Common Sense

I remember a number of years ago, after a morning of evaluating student oral presentations with a colleague and wondering why they sometimes said strange things, I mentioned that it seemed to me that people lost their common sense when they were speaking a language they were not very confident in. My colleague – who was a good linguist and had never experiences such issues – disagreed.

Continue reading

How to write – What to write.

I’ve often quoted Frank Smith when discussing writing.  In Writing and the writer, Smith distinguishes between “composition” and “transcription” in writing. “Composition” is deciding what you want to say, and “transcription” is what you have to do to say it. His advice is “The rule is simple: Composition and transcription must be separated, and transcription must come last. It is asking too much of anyone, and especially of students trying to improve all aspects of their writing ability, to expect that they can concern themselves with polished transcription at the same time that they are trying to compose. The effort to concentrate on spelling, handwriting, and punctuation at the same time that one is struggling with ideas and their expression not only interferes with composition but creates the least favorable situation in which to develop transcription skills as well” (Smith, 1982, p. 24).

After watching Juzo Itami’s 1995 film Shizukana seikatsu (A quiet life) recently I decided to read  Nobel prize winner Kenzaburu Oe – on whose novel the film is based. In his novel The Changeling, he deals with a similar situation:

Continue reading

IATEFL ESP SIG PCE, 2016 – Overview

I’ve just returned from the IATEFL English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Special Interest Group (SIG) Pre-Conference Event (PCE) in Birmingham, UK.

The theme of the PCE was tensions and debates in ESP and EAP.

As usual it was a very interesting day with teachers from many parts of the world discussing how they go about trying to meet the academic and professional linguistic needs of their students, sometimes with limited resources.

Continue reading

TESOL-IATEFL ESP discussion

I recently took part in a TESOL – IATEFL online discussion about how ESP projects can create positive social change.
Kevin Knight – the organiser – gave us the following task:

You are all members of a task force team to provide language training for employees of multinational corporation. The HR department of the company is interested in your ideas about providing not only in-house training but also involving local universities in the training of its employees. In addition, the HR department is wondering how such training could be connected to its annual report on Corporate Social Responsibility. Share your ideas in connection with the big picture: How ESP projects can create positive social change.

Continue reading

Where Next for EAP?

There has been much discussion recently about what exactly students have to do in order to succeed in HE. Gillett & Hammond (2009), for example, identified a range of tasks that need to be managed in order to succeed and Nesi & Gardner (2012) looked in great detail  at the genres which students need to work with. This has been a very useful contribution to the development of EAP.  However, Feak (2011) identifies the difficulties that some students might have with these genres in multidisciplinary degrees and courses.  Furthermore, my  recent experience working with students from one discipline, business students, has shown that many of the assignments that the students have to produce are much more complicated and not so easily classified.  I’d like to show some examples of these and ask how we can best help our insessional students to deal with them.

Continue reading

CLIL- Content & Language Integrated Learning

For several years now, I have been teaching on a university pre-masters programme. in a business school.

I have described some aspects of the programme here:

The Relationship between Academic Content and Language

The programme consists of several modules and I have been involved with several of them over the last 5 or 6 years. One module that I have spent a large amount of time on is “Introduction to accounting”. It was team-taught with an accounting lecturer and me. We worked very closely together and mainly used the same materials. The accounting lecturer concentrated on the accounting content and I focussed on the language content. I have taught on this module for 5 or 6 years – sometimes twice a year – and as time passed, I have slowly come to the conclusion that it was not really possible to separate the accounting content from the language. We described the course as a CLIL course as the business subjects we were teaching and the language was well integrated and the aim of the course was to develop both. However, as they are taught by different people, does that mean it should be described as an EMI course rather than a CLIL course or even CBI? It does not really matter what we call the course, but it is interesting to look into the distinction in more detail.

Continue reading